Smart contracts deserve thorough testing before going live
We've been auditing blockchain code since 2019, and one thing hasn't changed. Most vulnerabilities show up during systematic review, not after deployment. Our team runs comprehensive security checks so your project launches with confidence, not crossed fingers.
Schedule Security Review
How we approach your audit
Every blockchain project is different, but security issues tend to follow patterns. Here's how we dig through your code to find what matters.
Initial Assessment
We map your architecture and identify critical functions that handle assets or permissions
Manual Review
Line-by-line analysis of contract logic, focusing on access control and state management
Automated Testing
Run multiple security tools to catch common vulnerabilities and edge cases
Report Delivery
Detailed findings with severity ratings and practical recommendations for fixes
What we check during audits
Security testing isn't just about finding bugs. It's about understanding how attackers think and where they'll look for weaknesses. These are the areas we focus on in every review.
Access Control Issues
Functions that anyone can call when they shouldn't be able to. These cause the biggest headaches.
- Permission verification checks
- Role-based function restrictions
- Owner privilege escalation risks
Reentrancy Attacks
Still happening in 2025. We test every external call to make sure state updates happen in the right order.
- External call sequencing
- State update timing verification
- Callback vulnerability assessment
Integer Overflow
Math errors that break token economics. We verify all arithmetic operations handle edge cases properly.
- SafeMath implementation review
- Boundary condition testing
- Balance calculation verification
Linh Phương
Lead Security Auditor
BrightWaveSpark
Why manual review still matters
Automated tools are great for catching common mistakes. But they miss context. Last month we reviewed a DeFi protocol where the automated scan gave it a clean bill of health. Took us about two hours of manual testing to find a logic flaw that would've allowed anyone to drain liquidity pools under specific market conditions.
The tools flagged 47 low-priority issues. None of them mattered. The real vulnerability was in how three different functions interacted when called in a particular sequence. That's what manual review catches.
We've been doing this long enough to know where developers usually make mistakes. It's not always in the obvious places. Sometimes it's in the admin functions that "nobody will ever call" or in the upgrade mechanisms that get added last minute. Those are the spots we spend extra time on.
Ready to test your contracts?
Most audits take two to three weeks depending on code complexity. We're booking reviews for August and September 2025. Get in touch if you need security testing before your launch.