Stay informed about blockchain vulnerabilities, audit methodologies, and emerging threats. We share what we learn from real security assessments across different protocols and networks.
During our Q1 audits, we identified a pattern in cross-chain bridge implementations that left several protocols exposed. The issue wasn't in the obvious places most developers check.
Read Full Analysis
We ran parallel tests on five DeFi protocols—automated scanners versus human auditors. The results surprised even us. Some vulnerabilities only show up when you understand business logic, not just code.
Read Full Analysis
After auditing 23 local projects over the past year, we're seeing patterns in how Vietnamese blockchain teams approach security. Some observations about what's working and what needs attention.
Read Full Analysis
Last month, we caught a reentrancy vulnerability in a DeFi lending protocol that had already passed two other audits. The attack vector was buried in an innocuous helper function that most reviewers glossed over.
What made this interesting wasn't the reentrancy itself—that's Solidity 101. It was how the function interacted with three other contracts in a way that created a window of opportunity. Automated tools flagged nothing because each contract looked fine in isolation.
We've been working with the development team since discovery. They've implemented fixes and are planning a gradual rollout with monitoring. This is exactly why we insist on understanding the entire protocol architecture before diving into line-by-line code review.
Linh Khánh Trang
Senior Security Auditor
Most security issues we find aren't exotic zero-days. They're straightforward logic errors that happen when teams rush to market. A protocol might have brilliant cryptography but fail at basic access control. We've seen million-dollar exploits that boil down to checking the wrong variable in an if statement.